Skip to content
  • EN
  • About
    • About GFAN
    • GFAN Regional Partners
    • GFAN Strategy 2026-2030
  • News
    • GFAN Guide to Global Fund Board Meetings – June 2026
    • Report To Membership 2025
  • Tools for Advocacy
    • Grant Cycle 8
      • Key Resources for Grant Cycle 8
      • GFAN Brief – Stop the Slide on the Set-Asides
      • GFAN Brief – Guide for advocates on how Global Fund Grants can speed up and expand access to innovations
      • Transformative Impact of the Global Fund
      • Why Advocate for Debt to Health?
    • US Health MoUs
      • GFAN’s Helpful U.S. MoU Reading Guide!
      • US Bilateral MoUs for Health and Global Fund’s GC8: A Primer for Advocates
      • Key Partner Resources for US Health MoUs
    • Reframing Solidarity : Tackling Anti-ODA Narratives
  • GFAN Publications
    • All publications
    • Global Fund 54th Board Meeting – GFAN Report
    • Health In A Fractured Aid Landscape
  • Blog
  • GFAN Calls
    • 2026 GFAN Calls
    • 2025 GFAN Calls
    • 2024 GFAN Calls
    • 2023 GFAN Calls
    • 2022 GFAN Calls
    • 2021 GFAN Calls
    • 2020 GFAN Calls
    • 2019 GFAN Calls
  • Speakers
    • GFAN Speakers Bureau
    • Tool Kit
    • Photo and Video User Guide
  • Contact
  • Archived
    • 8th Replenishment
      • Pledge Tracker & Replenishment Advocacy Tools
      • 8th Replenishment Issue Briefs
      • Here I Am 2.0
      • Investment Case Advocacy Toolkit
      • How to Close a Funding Gap?
      • What Civil Society Expects from the 8th Replenishment
    • Global Fund Reprogramming Resources
    • GFAN @ World Health Summit 2025
    • GC7 Resources
    • Resources on the Pandemic Fund
    • COVID-19 Resources
    • TB HLM 2023 Affected Communities and Civil Society Coordination Hub
    • 7th Replenishment
      • Still Waiting, Still Dying: KVP Brief
      • GFAN Pledge Tracker
      • Fully Fund the Global Fund – Report and Briefs
        • Fully Fund the Global Fund: Get Back on Track to End AIDS, TB and Malaria in a Covid World
        • Fully Fund the Global Fund: Issue Briefs
        • Fully Fund the Global Fund: Social Media Kit
      • Pledging Conference 2022 @NYC
      • Preparatory Meeting & IC Advocacy Toolkit
        • 7 Asks for the 7th Replenishment
        • CS Statement on the Investment Case
    • GFAN in Munich @AIDS24
    • GFAN in Montréal @AIDS22
    • Global Fund Strategy Development
      • Global Fund Strategy Toolkit
      • Summary of top-level priorities areas for civil society & communities
Global Fund Advocates Network
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

JOIN GFAN

Dutch government review puts Global Fund at top of Scorecard

Oct 2015

October 28, 2015
Blog / accountability, grant making

During the last Replenishment (2013), the United Kingdom issued a multi-lateral aid review that ranked the Global Fund highly and was used by advocates in the UK and elsewhere in their calls for more funding for the Global Fund.

In June, the Dutch Government issued a report and “scorecard” of 31 multilateral organizations that assessed such things as “strategy and focus”, “anti-corruption” and “results control”. The Global Fund tied for highest marks with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) by gaining the highest score possible in 5 of the 8 categories.

GFAN has included some key points about this multilateral aid review in recent communications, however we have also translated the documents into English and can now share them in their entirety.

  • Summary Scorecard Multilaterals
  • Scorecard Global Fund

A few key points from the MAR/Scorecard:

  1. Global Fund achieved the highest score possible in 5 categories: Strategy and Focus; Results Control; Partnerships; Human Resources Policy and Anti Corruption Policy. In the remaining 3 categories (Effective Governance, Policy Evaluation and Financial Management it scored 2nd highest), the Dutch MAR placed the Global Fund in the second highest category of “sufficient” and indicated the expectation is that the Fund’s score would be on the rise in those areas.
  2. This score places the Global Fund at the top of the Scorecard with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development just slightly ahead of other high scorers including GAVI, the World Food Programme and the International Financial Institutions (IMF, World Bank and AfDB).
  3. In the Dutch context, the Minister has indicated that they will focus more on multilateral organizations that operate effectively and add value at a policy level to the efforts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Global Fund is listed as one where cooperation and financial contributions will be at a “substantial” level.
  4. The narrative accompanying the scorecard acknowledges that the Global Fund fully aligns with the Dutch Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights (SRHR) policy priority, is important to gender equality and also (to a lesser extent) for peace and security, humanitarian aid and food security.

Recent Posts

  • GFAN Brief – Guide for advocates on how Global Fund Grants can speed up and expand access to innovations
  • GFAN Brief – Stop the Slide on the Set-Asides
  • GLOBAL FUND 55TH BOARD MEETING – GFAN REPORT
  • GFANers Guide to AIDS 2026: Updates and Information
  • GFAN Guide to Global Fund Board Meetings – June 2026

GFAN Publications

  • GFAN Brief – Guide for advocates on how Global Fund Grants can speed up and expand access to innovations

  • GFAN Brief – Stop the Slide on the Set-Asides

  • GLOBAL FUND 55TH BOARD MEETING – GFAN REPORT

  • GFAN Guide to Global Fund Board Meetings – June 2026

  • GFAN SPEAKERS BUREAU 2026-2030

  • News
  • Blog
  • Speakers Bureau
  • Calls
  • GFAN Publications
  • About
JOIN GFAN
Global Fund Advocates Network
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

Global Fund Advocates Network 2026